中科院自然科学史所学术报告（11月2日）
The Evolution of Industrial R&D and Physics based Technology Transfer in the US since World War II
报告人：美国物理学会Orville R. Butler博士
地 点：中国科学院自然科学史研究所209会议室
时 间：2010年11月2日（星期二）上午9:30-11:30
ABSTRACT: For about thirty years after World War II American Corporation build centralized R&D Centers, hired the best and brightest scientists they could get and, with minimal constraints encouraged them to do research. These central laboratories were funded by the Corporation through a levy on its operating divisions. The many important discoveries made Bell Labs, IBM labs, RCA labs, Xerox PARC and other centralized corporate R&D centers were then “tossed over the wall” for the operating divisions to use. The last major centralized laboratory in the US was Xerox PARC established in 1970 (Though some might argue that Microsoft’s R& Center founded by Nathan Myhrvold in the late 1980s remains an exception). By the 1980s, however research in the central R&D labs began to transition from a focus on research to a focus on Development as many of the labs were renamed “Technology Centers.” Rather than doing research to create “new knowledge” technology centers focused on surveying new knowledge created elsewhere for possible acquisition and development within the corporation. Of course much fundamental research remained within universities and government laboratories and because of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980 universities were encouraged to commercialize their intellectual property. As a result the marketplace became a source for commoditized new knowledge, or innovation, where that new knowledge might come from research, but corporations would acquire new knowledge or new arrangements of knowledge and transform them into products related to their core business. The discovery of new knowledge might happen anywhere, but often its transmission into a marketable commodity took place in entrepreneurial startups. The role of research in these startups varies greatly and do a large degree appears to be correlated to the funding models for these startups. Our preliminary research into how physicist entrepreneurs fund their startups has thus far identified four funding models each with a different pattern of R&D. Our discussion of these transitions is based on about 120 interviews of physicists at 15 of the top 25 employers of physicists and provisional results from our ongoing interviews with (currently more than 50) physicist entrepreneurs.
报告人：美国物理学会Orville R. Butler博士
题 目：The Evolution of Industrial R&D and Physics based Technology Transfer in the US since World War II.
地 点：中国科学院自然科学史研究所209会议室
时 间：2010年11月2日（星期二）上午9：30-11：30
ABSTRACT: For about thirty years after World War II American Corporation build centralized R&D Centers, hired the best and brightest scientists they could get and, with minimal constraints encouraged them to do research. These central laboratories were funded by the Corporation through a levy on its operating divisions. The many important discoveries made Bell Labs, IBM labs, RCA labs, Xerox PARC and other centralized corporate R&D centers were then “tossed over the wall” for the operating divisions to use. The last major centralized laboratory in the US was Xerox PARC established in 1970 (Though some might argue that Microsoft’s R& Center founded by Nathan Myhrvold in the late 1980s remains an exception). By the 1980s, however research in the central R&D labs began to transition from a focus on research to a focus on Development as many of the labs were renamed “Technology Centers.” Rather than doing research to create “new knowledge” technology centers focused on surveying new knowledge created elsewhere for possible acquisition and development within the corporation. Of course much fundamental research remained within universities and government laboratories and because of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980 universities were encouraged to commercialize their intellectual property. As a result the marketplace became a source for commoditized new knowledge, or innovation, where that new knowledge might come from research, but corporations would acquire new knowledge or new arrangements of knowledge and transform them into products related to their core business. The discovery of new knowledge might happen anywhere, but often its transmission into a marketable commodity took place in entrepreneurial startups. The role of research in these startups varies greatly and do a large degree appears to be correlated to the funding models for these startups. Our preliminary research into how physicist entrepreneurs fund their startups has thus far identified four funding models each with a different pattern of R&D. Our discussion of these transitions is based on about 120 interviews of physicists at 15 of the top 25 employers of physicists and provisional results from our ongoing interviews with (currently more than 50) physicist entrepreneurs.